Posted in Cultural Commentary, Everyday Musings

Crone Era Early Admissions: I’ve Been in My Crone Era Since my 20s, but I Just Found the Word

Fifty, done with organized religion, and finally naming a lifelong pattern of choosing solitude, judgment, and mortality on her own terms. One woman’s case for the crone.

Earlier this week I was talking to my neighbor (F, 25-ish), who is roughly half my age, about what I’ve been watching lately. Vampire Diaries. I’m nearing the end of the series. She lit up — oh, you have to watch Originals next, oh, you have to watch Legacies. I told her I’d already seen both. In fact, I’d seen them first. I watched Legacies before I ever touched Vampire Diaries, got curious about Klaus Mikaelson’s backstory, went to Originals, and only then worked my way back to the beginning. I’ve been going backward through the whole thing on purpose, which is apparently not how anyone else does this.

Zoe (on the stool) and me watching a later season episode of Vampire Diaries.

She also asked if I’d seen Gilmore Girls. I told her that one aired a little after my time as a young adult — I was already past the demographic it was written for when it aired. Now I have to go back and watch it anyway, because I’ve spent twenty years watching most of that cast grow up and get better at their craft in other things, and there’s no reason not to close the loop.

None of that is the point. The point is what happened after she left: I sat with the fact that a conversation about teen vampire shows had somehow confirmed something I’d suspected for a while.

I don’t think I’m entering my crone era. I think I’ve been in it since I was much younger, and I only just found the word for it.

What Crone Actually Means

The maiden-mother-crone triad shows up across a lot of pre-Christian and folk traditions as a way of mapping womanhood in thirds, roughly tied to a woman’s relationship with fertility rather than to age or ungendered life experiences. The maiden is beginning — curiosity, discovery, a life not yet spent on anyone else. The mother is the productive middle — creation, caretaking, output, whether that’s children or work or anything else built for others to use.

The crone is the third phase, the one that arrives after the culture stops expecting fertility and production from a woman, and it gets read two very different ways depending on who’s doing the reading.

The unflattering version, the one baked into most fairy tales, treats the crone as used up — a woman past her use, cast off, shriveled, dangerous in a bitter way. The older, more honest version treats her as the one who’s finally free of the expectations that ran her first two-thirds, and dangerous in a completely different way: she has nothing left to prove and nothing left to lose, which means her judgment finally belongs entirely to her. She knows things because she’s outlived the point of performing for anyone. She’s associated with wisdom, with the ability to sit with death without flinching, with cutting straight past politeness to what’s actually true.

Artist: Crocula; Source

That second definition is the one I mean. Not withered. Unmanaged. I’m not describing a phase I’ve entered at fifty. I’m describing a way of operating that the culture doesn’t have a slot for until a woman is old enough that it stops trying to sell her something.

Judgment Is Not for Rent

I read constantly as a kid, which in the capital “S” Southern culture I was raised in meant one thing if you were a girl: you were going to be an English teacher. Not asked. Told. By everyone. I started college in that degree program, got into the program, and hated almost every minute of it — not the literature, the bureaucracy of the K-12 education system. A room full of people who had never met me deciding how I was supposed to think and what I was supposed to do with a skill I already had. I left the systemic education path but continued on exploring language and literature. The teaching I did in higher education and the teaching I do now in business, much later and in a completely different form, is mine.

There’s an older, heavier version of that same expectation that follows a lot of women: you are the eldest daughter, so you will be the one who manages your aging parents, financially and otherwise, no matter what that costs you. I’m not going to get into the specifics of that one here. What I’ll say is that I looked at what was actually being asked of me, weighed it honestly, and said no. That decision cost me a relationship a lot of people would have kept out of obligation. I don’t regret it.

Somewhere in between those two things sits something much smaller and much more physical. A few months after I turned fifty this year, I stopped shaving. Legs, underarms, all of it. I’d already been drifting that direction for a decade — weekly, then biweekly, then monthly — but this year I just decided to stop doing it at all. The hair grew in sparser than I expected and softer than I expected. I don’t feel it unless the wind picks up. I’m not making a statement when I shower. I’ve just stopped thinking about it, which might be the most honest measure of how little it ever mattered to me in the first place.

Even punishment when I was a kid came with an expectation attached, and I never met it. Getting grounded is supposed to feel like a loss — kids are supposed to want to run around and make noise and messes, want the TV, want the phone, and sulk when all of that gets taken away. Instead, grounding meant a closed door and permission to read in silence for as long as I wanted. When they took the phone away too, it barely registered.

None of these three things are the same size. But they’re the same shape. Somebody hands me an expectation with their confidence attached to it, and I check whether it actually serves me before I put it on.

Trusty Old Reruns

The shows and movies I go back to on purpose have a pattern I hadn’t clocked until I said it out loud: Big Bang Theory. Charmed. The old Roseanne, before the reboot muddied it. Hackers, from back when being a teenage computer expert on dial-up was genuinely disruptive. Goonies, because I had that exact childhood — a pack of kids building forts in the marsh behind our neighborhood and disappearing into our own version of an adventure nobody adult had sanctioned. Fast and Furious. Pitch Perfect. Harry Potter and the unfinished Fantastic Beasts run.

What ties them together isn’t nostalgia for its own sake. It’s that almost all of them center people who are marginalized, odd, or building something outside the system they were handed — witches, hackers, outsiders, a family that doesn’t look like the sitcom standard — and I go back to spend more time with them on purpose. Watching a show out of publication order, it turns out, was just a streaming algorithm doing its job. Rewatching is the actual habit, and it’s not about knowing what happens next. It’s about choosing, deliberately, whose company I want to keep for a few more hours.

I’d rather stay in on a weekend night in pajamas with a rerun with a predictable story arc and ending than go out for the sake of going out.

I know that reads as introverted at best and neurodivergent at worst to some people.

I’m fine with both readings.

The Church I Was Handed Back

Part of why this has been on my mind this particular week: the drag performer Jinkx Monsoon made news arguing that children shouldn’t be raised inside a single religion at all — that they should be left alone to explore belief once they’re old enough to actually choose it, with real consent, instead of having a faith installed before they’re capable of agreeing to it. The word doing the work there is “consent.” Every infant baptism, every confirmation, every first communion is a parent deciding what’s right and then installing it in a child who has no vote. That’s not a technicality. It’s the actual mechanism.

I’ve watched this play out at both extremes. One person close to me was raised Catholic, later questioned her gender identity in a way the church wouldn’t accept, and was rejected outright for it — a door closed permanently over something she didn’t choose and the church refused to make room for. Someone else I know spent years questioning his own gender identity and left religion early in life partly because of it, then later in life settled into a more traditional identity, got married, got baptized, and now practices comfortably. I’m not saying either path is wrong, or that you can’t leave and come back. What unsettles me is the size of the gap between those two outcomes and the question sitting underneath it: is a return to religion, at that point, a genuine belief, or is it the price of being accepted somewhere? “Acceptable” and “true” aren’t the same word, and I don’t think organized religion has ever reliably known the difference between them, especially not with children too young to ask the question themselves.

There’s one expectation I left out above because it’s bigger than the others and it deserves its own room: I was raised in the church, and I don’t practice any religion now. For clarity, I define “religion” as a systemic and observable set of rituals and doctrines accepted as fundamental to identifying as a [name of the religion or religious sect]. Religion is not limited to Judeo-Christian options or even to theistic options.

I was baptized as an infant into the Evangelical Lutheran Church in America, and raised in one of the oldest continuously operating Lutheran congregations in the country, in Charleston. My mother’s family were Southern Baptist for generations before a family friend brought her to that Lutheran church instead, and it stuck hard enough that it became the church she was married in and the one she raised us in. My father, Southern Baptist by birth, never practiced anything in my lifetime; in him I have a model for agnosticism sitting across the dinner table from me my whole childhood, and he’s a perfectly good person. I was born on October 31, which is Reformation Day — the anniversary of Martin Luther nailing his complaints to a church door in 1517 and launching the protestant reformation that would result in the establishment of the Lutheran church — and my mother took that as confirmation, literally, that she’d picked the right religion.

So I was raised to be Lutheran the way most kids raised in liturgical traditions are: infant baptism, Sunday school, no vote in the matter. In ninth grade I ran a small project, half school assignment and half genuine curiosity, visiting other kids’ churches and talking to their families about what they believed and why. That was the beginning of treating religion as something to investigate rather than something to inherit, though I didn’t have that language for it yet. And it’s a key reason that after confirmation, instead of continuing on into high school Sunday School and the youth group, I joined the choir instead — a small, quiet redirection that in hindsight was the first step out the door rather than further in.

College made it even more obvious. I went to a Lutheran college, one my home church had helped found, in a town built around it. I stopped going to church entirely. Not the weekly campus chapel, not a local church, nothing. I came back to church four years later while in my first bought of graduate school; again I joined a choir in a church I chose myself, and reconstructed years later how much of that was actually about the music. The second time I went through graduate school at that same university, I didn’t go back to church at all, for three years, and nothing about my life felt unfinished.

When I moved to New York, church became a way to build a social life in a city where I knew no one, and it worked, mostly through the choir again — the friends I made there were fellow paid singers, not members of the congregation. I even served on the church council and substituted as worship leader and sermonizer twice. I was good at it. The service is so patterned it’s easy to run once you know it. I can still recite the entire liturgy from memory. I can sing the cantering without opening the book. That’s pattern, not faith. Being good at leading it and finding it meaningful turned out to be two completely separate things, and I knew that even while I was up there doing it well.

The clearest moment came when I moved back to South Carolina to help with my parents and was expected to return to the church I grew up in. I couldn’t. Not because of doctrine — because of identity. To that congregation, I wasn’t a person; I was Marsha’s daughter, expected to be a younger copy of my mother. At a women’s retreat, someone called out that they needed Marsha’s daughter to come lead a song. I stood up and walked out. That was the hard stop. The next time I went to church, I had found two workable substitutes after that: a paid singing position at a Presbyterian church, which was a job, and membership somewhere large and casual enough that no one would ever ask me to lead anything or know who my mother was. Both let me be present without being claimed.

Then in 2020 I moved during COVID, and church simply stopped. No congregation to return to or establish a connection with, easy livestreams to half-watch instead of attend, and once that habit of engagement broke, it never came back. Two more moves came and went — a couple of visits in North Carolina, none at all in Virginia — and by the time I landed in Florida I was watching family navigate their own version of this: they’d left one church over its stance on nontraditional life choices and found a Lutheran congregation that welcomed the same people fully, in membership and in leadership, which mattered enough to them to make the switch. I went with them occasionally, filled in as the responsible adult getting the kids to church when their parents traveled, and enjoyed all of it exactly as much as you’d enjoy a pleasant, low-stakes social occasion. When those same kids, no longer needing the Lutheran church’s acceptance, drifted back toward the Catholic church that had pushed them out in the first place, I didn’t go with them. By 2025 I was telling my family plainly that I was done with church, even for the occasions they considered significant. My local family has accepted my choice.

What replaced it started around my fiftieth birthday in 2025. My birthday, that same October 31st my mother once read as proof of her own correct choice, is also Samhain — a pre-Christian holiday marking the turn toward the dark half of the year. I don’t celebrate it. I don’t ritualize it. But sometime around turning fifty I started taking seriously an idea I’d been circling for years: that the word “magic” and the word “faith” describe the same thing, and the only difference is which one your culture has agreed to protect.

Consider this example: Rose quartz is supposed to open you up to love, and I can’t prove how, scientifically, and that gets called magic. Wine and a piece of bread are supposed to become the actual body and blood of a man who never handed either out at a table for people to eat, literally or otherwise, and that gets called faith.

The rose quartz tower and rose quartz, white jasper, and ocean jasper spheres I have in my bathroom to help me start my day with love.

Both are claims about the unseen that nobody can produce evidence for. One of those claims used to get women burned. I’ve never been able to unsee that asymmetry once I saw it, and I have no patience left for a culture that spends December insisting one specific unprovable belief is the reason for the season while treating every other unprovable belief as a threat.

I used to think this started in the last year or two. Looking back at the ninth-grade project, I think it started closer to age fourteen or fifteen.

Domestic, Witchy, Wild — Same Thing

This year I expanded from quick refrigerator pickling, which is really just a fast infusion, into actual heat-processed canning/pickling and fermentation. Shelf-stable, not quick-fix. Partly that’s for its own sake. Mostly it’s practice — I’m preparing for a more frontier-oriented life in Alaska, where the growing season is short and intense and everything after it depends on what you preserved while you had the chance. But sometimes I find myself self-identifying as “the witch in the woods” when I’m doing things like this.

I don’t draw much of a line between domestic, witchy, wild woman, and frontier woman.

People sometimes hear “domestic” and picture a fifties housewife with her makeup on before her husband wakes up. That’s not it, and it’s not close. What I mean is something more basic: paying attention to the physical world around you, understanding what it offers, and bringing it into your house and your daily life instead of outsourcing all of it to a supply chain.

This week I made fire cider for the first time — the kind of thing that sits exactly at the intersection of all four of those words. It’s a folk remedy, it’s fermented, it’s built from what you have on hand rather than what a store sells you, and it assumes you’d rather understand how to take care of yourself than default to someone else’s version of the answer. It fit into the same week as a jar of something else preserving on the counter, which is more or less how my kitchen runs now.

Fire cider made 9/5/2026: tumeric, ginger, garlic, red onion, rosemary, thyme, lemons, oranges, cinnamon sticks, black peppercorns, whole cloves, apple cider vinegar.

The Ending Is a Fact, Not a Crisis

Here’s the part that actually convinced me the crone era isn’t a 2026 development.

In 2000, my grandfather was in a coma. The adult members of the family took shifts sitting with him. Eventually the hospital raised the question of turning off life support, and the decision landed on my grandmother, who couldn’t make it. It passed to her two daughters, who couldn’t agree with each other. As the oldest grandchild, it would have come to me next. When I understood where things stood, I said it plainly: if the decision comes to me, I will turn the machines off. His life was over. Keeping the equipment running past that point wasn’t kindness. It was practical, humane, financially sane, and true, all at the same time.

I’ve since told other people, in other families, that I’ll be that person for them too — the one who says the sentence out loud when everyone else is too tangled in their own grief or love or guilt to say it. That’s not coldness. It’s that I don’t carry the same emotional fog most people carry around death, so I can see the decision clearly enough to make it.

This week alone, Dolly Parton died, Tim Curry died, and Gloria Steinem died, all in their eighties or nineties, and the reaction online was somewhere between shock and outrage, as if any of that should have been avoidable. It wasn’t. Bodies end. Most of what we call medicine is organized around postponing that fact indefinitely, which is, by definition, insane — doing the same thing repeatedly and expecting a different outcome, when the outcome has never once been different for anyone. The mind isn’t bound by that. Whatever people mean when they talk about someone’s spirit or their work outliving them, that part isn’t made of the tissue that’s going to fail. The body is a different category, and I’ve never had trouble telling the two apart.

I have benchmark ages where I stop and take stock of where I am — not to fix a number for my own death, but to check whether I’m still living the life I actually want. The next check-in is sixty, a little over nine years out. Between now and then, the job is to make sure that when I get there, I can genuinely be at peace with however much closer I am to the end. That’s not morbid. It’s the only planning that’s ever made sense to me.

The maiden-mother-crone framework predates the religion I was handed at birth by a long way. So does the version of me that walked out of a women’s retreat rather than answer to my mother’s name, that had already decided to turn off a machine when two grown women couldn’t, that decided a rose quartz and a communion wafer are making the same unprovable claim and only one of them gets protected. I didn’t arrive at any of this in 2026. I just spent forty-nine years assuming it needed a better explanation than the one I already had. It didn’t. It needed a name, and the name is crone — not a phase I’ve entered, but the thing I was doing the whole time, before anyone had agreed to let me do it.

Posted in Crystal Pairings

Grouping Crystals for a Task: Sodalite and Fluorite for a Presentation

Today I gave a five-to-seven-minute update at an all-company meeting on a topic outside my professional expertise, one I still happen to own for this company. I do not write scripts. I build slides and let the visual carry part of the load, an old habit from years of teaching. For the nerves — not anxiety, just the low hum in the stomach — I paired two stones for the job.

A light green fluorite mushroom sat on the laptop, facing the screen I’d be presenting from. Fluorite sharpens focus, and it does not need to be touched to work, only present. A sodalite worry stone stayed in my hand, thumb working the indent, generating friction and heat. Sodalite supports clear communication, useful for someone who tends toward tangents and whose speech impediment can scramble word sounds under pressure.

Two stones, two jobs: one anchoring focus in the room, one steadying the words leaving my mouth. That is grouping — not a pile of favorites, but stones assigned to a task.

After the presentation, I took a moment to decompress with Facebook – with my flourite and sodalite pairing still on my laptop.

What Sodalite and Fluorite Do

Sodalite – Active.

A deep blue stone associated with clear thinking and precise communication. It is used for public speaking, writing, and any situation where the right word matters more than the most words. It works on logic and language, not volume.

Fluorite – Passive.

Prized for mental clarity and focus. It filters distraction and steadies concentration rather than generating energy of its own. Fluorite comes in several colors, and the color shifts the emphasis slightly — green leans toward heart-centered focus and decision-making, which is why I chose it here over a purple or clear piece.

Paired, the two stones cover language and attention at the same time: sodalite for what I say, fluorite for staying on task while I say it.

Who Am I – You Ask?

I have dabbled in crystal-based synergies for more than 30 years and made it my 2026 goal to intentionally develop and deepen my practice. I specialize in crystal groupings for nuanced situations and to address multiple needs simultaneously.

Posted in Cultural Commentary

I Am a Judgy Bitch (And I Love It)

This is my perspective. Yours may differ. I’m not asking you to agree — I’m asking you to notice.

We Don’t Judge

A year or so ago, everyone’s feed filled up with the same video format. Someone would sit in front of a camera, say some version of “we listen, and we don’t judge,” and then confess something — a belief, a habit, a choice — that they were bracing for the world to call controversial. Weird. Wrong.

The setup did the opposite of what it promised. If you have to announce that judgment is off the table before you speak, you’ve already told everyone in the room that judgment is exactly what’s coming. The disclaimer wasn’t protection. It was an admission.

I didn’t have a problem with the confessions. I had a problem with the premise. Because judgment isn’t the enemy here. Judgment is the entire operating system.

We Judge Constantly. We Just Rename It.

Your annual performance review is a judgment. Someone sat down, looked at what you did all year, and decided how good it was. They might call it an “evaluation” or “feedback” or “a data-driven assessment of your contributions,” but strip the euphemism and you’re left with the same act: a person deciding whether you were right or wrong, good or not good enough, and putting a number on it.

A test score is a judgment. A grade is a judgment. A performance rating, a Yelp review, a tenure decision, a “how did that landing look” from a judge holding up a card at a competition — all judgment, dressed in whatever costume makes it feel palatable for the room it’s in.

We don’t actually object to judgment. We object to the word. So we launder it. We call it “feedback” instead of criticism. We call it “assessment” instead of judgment. We call it “discernment” when we like the person doing it, and “judgmental” when we don’t. Same act. Different PR.

Roseanne did the best version of this I’ve ever seen, and it wasn’t even about judgment — it was about death, which runs on the identical mechanism. In “Wait Till Your Father Gets Home,” Jackie has to call a relative and tell her their father died. She can’t say it. She works through euphemism after euphemism — passed away, gone, not with us anymore — each one softer and each one failing to land, until the relative on the other end still doesn’t understand, and Jackie is finally reduced to shouting the plain words: dad’s dead.

It’s one of the funniest and bleakest scenes in the show’s run, and it works because it’s true: euphemism doesn’t actually protect anyone from the fact. It just delays the moment someone has to say the fact out loud. Judgment gets the same treatment. We circle it with softer words right up until the moment the plain one is the only thing left that’s actually clear.

Where the Fear Comes From

I think a lot of this traces back to a very old idea: Judgment Day. Christianity’s the easiest cultural driver to point to for a Western audience, but it’s nowhere near the only one. This isn’t a Christianity problem. It’s a species problem.

Ancient Egyptian belief weighed the heart on a literal scale against a feather, and a wrong verdict meant the soul got devoured on the spot. Islam has Yawm al-Qiyamah, the Day of Judgment, deeds read from a book and weighed — same bones as the Christian version, pass or fail, no partial credit. Zoroastrianism, which likely predates and influenced both, has the soul crossing the Chinvat Bridge: wide and easy for the righteous, razor-thin and impassable for everyone else. Judaism has its own version at Rosh Hashanah and Yom Kippur — being inscribed in the Book of Life or not — though it leaves more room for repentance and revision than the others do.

Different religions, different centuries, different continents, and they all independently landed on the same idea: a moment where you get judged, and the verdict is binary. That’s not a coincidence. That’s a pattern. Humanity keeps building the same myth because judgment — real, final, weighted judgment — is one of the load-bearing concepts in how we think about a life meaning anything at all.

But final judgment isn’t the model for the judgment we actually do all day. Final judgment is binary. A performance review has levels. A test has partial credit. A friend’s opinion of your choice isn’t a verdict on your soul — it’s one data point from one person. We inherited the terror of the word from the myth and then slapped it onto the mundane, everyday version, where it never belonged in the first place.

What We’re Actually Trying to Sell Instead

If judgment is off-limits, something has to replace it. And what we’ve replaced it with is easy.

Easygoing. Affable. Accommodating. Low-maintenance. Not a big deal. These are the traits we now market ourselves by — at work, with friends, in families, and especially, I’ve noticed, among other parents, where the fastest way to get frozen out of a group is to be the one who has opinions about anyone else’s kid. Being easy has become the social currency that judgment used to be measured against.

Here’s what’s actually underneath that trade. Judgment carries a real, structural risk: if I judge you and land on the bad side of it, we might not be friends. I might not tolerate your choice. There might not be a place for us to connect. That’s the actual stake people are avoiding when they perform “I don’t judge” — not the judgment itself, which they’re doing anyway, but the possibility of the conclusion costing them the relationship. Calling yourself easygoing lets you keep judging privately while advertising that the judgment will never cost anyone anything. It’s a promise of no consequences, not a promise of no verdict.

The Word That Gives It Away

If you want to catch judgment in the act, stop looking for the word “judgmental” and start listening for “should.”

“Should” is judgment’s most common disguise, and it’s a worse disguise than people think, because it isn’t really hidden at all. “You should do this.” “You should have done that.” Every single one of those sentences is a verdict about the gap between what a person did and what the speaker has decided was the correct action. That’s not description. That’s not neutral. That’s a judgment wearing a very thin coat.

I’ve got a favorite way of flagging it: say it as “shouldy” — like you’re saying “shitty” with a lisp. Don’t make a shouldy decision. It’s a little joke, but it’s doing real work, because it forces you to hear what “should” already smuggles in: a moral grade, dressed up as friendly advice.

Here’s a recent, unignorable example. On July 20, 2026, at a Cubs–Twins game at Wrigley Field, a fan stayed seated during the national anthem. A man sitting behind him leaned in, told him to stand, and struck him on the back of the head when he didn’t move. (source) The video went viral, and the online argument that followed was, almost word for word, a referendum on “should”: should you stand for the anthem, should you stand as a sign of respect, should you be legally required to stand. There is no law requiring spectators to stand, and the underlying choice not to is protected symbolic expression — but that hasn’t stopped the internet from litigating the moral question anyway, in exactly the vocabulary this essay is about.

Look at the sentence “you should stand for the national anthem.” That’s not a statement of fact. That’s a judgment, wearing the word “should” as its delivery mechanism, about a choice the speaker believes is morally correct — and a judgment, by implication, of everyone who chooses differently. And here’s mine, plainly, no “should” required: a man hit a stranger. Full stop. That’s battery. He should be arrested. Yes, that’s a “should” too — I’m not exempting myself from the mechanism, I’m just not pretending the word isn’t doing exactly what it always does.

Yes, I know that both men continued their discussion later, and the man who was seated during the anthem declined to press charges or allow security to remove the man who hit him.

Bless Your Heart

Nobody has ever formalized the art of judging someone while smiling at them quite like the American South did.

I grew up in it — capital-S Southern culture — and it runs on precisely this move. “Bless your heart” is not a blessing. It is a verdict, delivered in a register soft enough that the person can’t object without looking thin-skinned. It says: I’ve judged you, I’ve judged you unfavorably, and I’ve wrapped the judgment in enough sugar that you’ll thank me for it. It’s judgment with plausible deniability.

Steel Magnolias built an entire comic sensibility out of this. Clairee, played by Olympia Dukakis, has a line about wanting to be the one people bring their gossip to first — an invitation dressed as generosity, when it’s really an appetite for judgment served hot. Later, at Shelby’s wedding, she and M’Lynn watch a woman on the dance floor and land on a line comparing what they’re seeing to two pigs wrestling under a blanket, plus a dig about all that money spent on the dress and none of it on the undergarment to hold it in.

It’s vicious. It’s delivered with total warmth. That combination — the warmth as the delivery mechanism for the verdict — is the whole Southern trick, and it works because it lets everyone in the room feel like nice people while being exactly as judgmental as I am. They just found better packaging.

That’s the case for why I reject the idea that judgment itself is the problem. Every culture does this. Every one of them has built a socially acceptable disguise for the exact same activity — grading, ranking, deciding who’s in and who’s out — because the activity itself is universal. Some cultures call it feedback. Some call it discernment. Mine called it “bless your heart.” None of it is an absence of judgment. It’s just judgment with better manners than mine.

I’m a Judgy Bitch

I’ve known this about myself for a long time — since ninth grade, 1989, when a Myers-Briggs assessment gave it a name for the first time. I test as an INTJ. The J stands for Judging. In that framework, it’s not a mood or a bad day. It’s structural. It’s how my mind is built to process the world: gather information, then reach a conclusion. Not “gather information and hold it open indefinitely.” Conclude. Decide. Judge.

I could put on a mask that makes it look like I’m not doing that. Plenty of people do. But the native process underneath doesn’t change. I look at something and I form a conclusion about it. That’s not a flaw I’m managing. It’s not a character defect I’m in recovery from. It’s the shape of my mind, and I’ve stopped apologizing for it.

I am judgmental. I am a judgy bitch. And I don’t think that’s a bad way of thinking.

Things I Will Judge You For

Since we’re being honest: here’s a partial list.

I will judge you for maintaining a pristine, manicured lawn of foreign invasive grass instead of using that same square footage to grow food — something that actually feeds the soil, feeds a body, and puts something healthy back into the environment instead of a chemical-dependent monoculture that does nothing but look tidy. Yes, I know HOAs are often the reason. Push back on the HOA. If more people prioritized function over appearance, we would not be nearly as deep into the climate mess we’re in.

I will judge you for saying “mis-CHEE-vee-us” instead of “MIS-chi-vus” (there is no fourth syllable in mischievous — it does not exist, you invented it), because you sound like an idiot.

And I will judge you for insisting that Sprouts or Whole Foods is “actually cheaper” than Target or Walmart’s store brand. It isn’t. What you’re actually saying is that you’re too bougie to buy the store brand, and you’ve lied to yourself about the math to avoid admitting it. That self-delusion is the part I’m judging — not the shopping preference.

I will judge you for dropping a random apostrophe into a year or a last name ending in “s” when all you’re trying to do is make it plural. Years are never possessive. There is no situation — none — where a possessive year is correct. The 1990s do not own anything. Neither do the Harrises, the Joneses, or whoever else you’re trying to talk about in the plural. An apostrophe means either possession or a missing letter. Pluralizing an “s” name or a decade is neither. Put it down.

And I will judge you, hard, for citing “that’s the law” or “that’s the rule” or “we’ve always done it this way” as the entire argument and stopping there. Laws and rules are not neutral, and plenty of them were built to encode exactly the discrimination or injustice you’re being asked to examine. Hiding behind the rule instead of engaging with what the rule actually does is not a principled stance. It’s a refusal to think, dressed up as one. If your entire justification for an action or an inaction is that it’s the law, full stop, no further thought required, I’m judging you as an absolute jackass — because you had the option to notice and acknowledge the egregious injustices of the system you’re operating inside of, and you chose not to.

The Part I Actually Want You to Sit With

None of that list is a character indictment. It’s just me, doing what my mind does natively, out loud, without the sugar-coating. I could deliver every one of those the way Clairee would — warm, smiling, plausible deniability fully intact. I’ve simply decided I’d rather skip the packaging.

So if you cringed reading any of it, ask yourself what you actually flinched at. Was it the conclusion, or was it the fact that I said it plainly instead of finding a gentler word to hide it in? Because you scored something today. You ranked a restaurant, rated a coworker’s presentation in your head, decided a friend’s decision was a mistake. You judged. All day. Constantly. The only question is whether you’re going to own the word for it, or keep calling yourself easygoing while doing nothing but.

I am a judgy bitch. I’d rather be honest about what my mind is doing than pretend it’s doing something gentler.

Posted in Everyday Musings

A Cat Named Richard aka the Lump in the Bed

How We Found Each Other

In late October 2021, I lost Shadow suddenly to cardiac arrest. For the first time in fifteen years, I had no cat in my house at all. I didn’t know how long I’d need before I was ready to look again — it turned out to be about a week.

I logged onto the Orange County Animal Shelter’s website, where they post photos of the cats available. I was specifically looking for an adult — didn’t need to be a senior, just not another kitten. My first three cats, Miles, Angel, and Shadow, had all come to me as brand-new babies, and after having Shadow as a solo cat for so long, with a rhythm I’d come to love, I was only thinking about bringing home one more.

That’s when I saw him: a cat named Richard. Of all the names you could give a cat, Richard stood out. I had no real commitment to adopting that day — I just thought, why not go meet him?

So my niece and I drove over. When I told the shelter staff I’d come to meet Richard, they seemed surprised and a little excited, though I didn’t understand why yet. In the meet-and-greet room, I noticed — just barely, in the back of my mind — that there were two cats in the little holding cage.

They brought out Richard first. He was standoffish. Not scared, not aggressive — just reserved. Behind him in the cage, I could see another cat pacing, watching, active.

As we were getting ready to put Richard back, I asked some questions, and the man helping us said: “This is Zoe. Richard’s part of a bonded pair. So far we only have applications on Richard — we hold bonded pairs for forty-eight hours to see if anyone wants both.”

I’d never heard the term bonded pair before. He explained: cats who become so emotionally attached that separating them changes their behavior — they can act out, decline quickly, even get sick and die from the separation of the bond.

That sounded significant. So I said, let’s meet Zoe. If Zoe and I click too, then it’s fine.

Zoe came out and was an instant love bug — she’d never met a stranger, hugging on me the way Shadow used to. I thought, no big deal, I’ll take them both. Because I was willing, I brought them both home that same day.

While I was still at the shelter, I learned something else. Richard had been at that shelter once before, as a kitten, and they still had his old intake record — including a birthday: October 31st. My birthday. They don’t do rigorous verification on a kitten’s exact birth date, but it was close enough.

Zoe didn’t have an original record like his, so nobody knew her real birthday. But since they’d always been brought in together, and had been surrendered a week before October 31st, the shelter had simply given her the same date on her paperwork. Another October 31st.

The story behind why they’d come back to the shelter as adults was simple and sad: their owner had died. Neighbors across the street took the cats in temporarily while the family came to settle things, and when no one in the family wanted them, the neighbors surrendered them.

Between the name, the bonded pair, and two cats who — one way or another — shared my birthday, it felt like too many signs to ignore. It was just easy.

The shelter adopted both of them out to me for the price of one, sent us home with food and toys, and I loaded two very unhappy, crying cats into carriers for the thirty-to-forty-five-minute drive home. One of them — probably Zoe, who still gets carsick from stress — pooped in the carrier. I filmed the unboxing when we got home, so somewhere I still have that first footage of the two of them, fresh out of their boxes, becoming part of my life.

The First Eighteen Months

Coming home that first day, it was easy to assume the roles: Richard, a giant twenty-pound (slightly overweight, but not really) boy, must be the dominant one. Zoe, a teeny seven or eight pounds and still kittenish enough that I wondered if her age had been overestimated to match his, must be the follower.

Eighteen months in, I understood it was the opposite. Zoe was the one taking care of Richard. Zoe had adopted him.

During that first year and a half, I started paying close attention to Richard’s behavior — even posting some of it on Facebook at the time — because I came to believe it told a story. Not one of active abuse, but of neglect and isolation.

There was a clear line between his daylight self and his nighttime self. During daylight hours, I’d find him in one of three places. If he needed to fully disappear, he went to the bottom shelf of my closet, tucked behind and underneath my hanging shirts where he couldn’t be seen. He wasn’t cowering there — he’d curl up and actually sleep.

When he felt a little braver, he’d wedge himself between the top blanket and the top sheet of my bed. I called him “the lump in the bed.” That became his standing afternoon routine — reliably there between about one and five o’clock. But once it hit five, especially once winter made it dark by then, he’d start to emerge.

His third spot was the bathroom — the darkest room in the house. He wasn’t squeezed behind the toilet or hiding in a cabinet. He’d just lie out in the open, on the rug, in the dark. That one always read to me as isolation rather than simple hiding — like he might once have been shut away somewhere dark and alone.

Zoe never did any of this. She was always visible — on the pillow if she slept on the bed, on top of everything if she slept on the sofa. The only time she ever got under the covers was to snuggle next to me once I’d already covered up myself.

My guess is that Richard had spent real time as a solo cat, and this was how he’d learned to cope with the loneliness.

Learning to Trust

It took about eighteen months for Richard to fully come out of his shell — and the first real sign of him accepting me came around the six-month mark.

It always happened at night, in the dark, while I was asleep — sometime around two or three in the morning, based on the couple of times I woke enough to notice. However I was lying, he’d come and snuggle against my back. He still wasn’t ready to be touched or played with on demand; he wanted to control the interaction. But he chose to be there, against my back, in the dark hours before sunrise, and I loved it.

A few months after that came a rarer, second stage — maybe a couple of times a year, I’d wake up and find him curled against my front instead, right against my torso and arms, close enough that all I had to do was twitch my fingers to start petting him. That was one of my favorite ways to wake up.

Toward the very end, as he got sicker, that spot against my torso became something he asked for as soon as I got into bed each night — sometimes for twenty minutes, sometimes thirty or forty. One of the last nights, he stayed there a long time, wanting those pets.

Around eighteen months in, he also started joining me on the loveseat where I spend my evenings — my dinner spot, my TV spot. He’d jump up onto the open seat beside me and curl up to sleep. He wouldn’t want to be touched, tolerating maybe a couple of pets after he’d settled, but mostly he just wanted to be near me on his own terms. That became part of our routine, and it eventually grew into him actively asking for affection.

That asking evolved over time, too. First it was just sitting and staring at me. Later, a light paw tap on my arm — no claws, just a signal. Eventually it became headbutts, sometimes paired with a gentle reach-and-grab with his claws to pull my arm toward him.

The Butt Pats

Richard loved having his butt patted — that dopamine hit cats get — more than almost anything else, and it always came bundled with another ritual: smelling my feet and legs to check where I’d been.

If I’d been out of the house, the moment I walked back in, he wanted both: sniffing my feet and shoes to see if I’d been “stepping out on him,” while I patted his butt at the same time. If I’d been gone a long stretch, I’d actually sit down on the floor so he could sniff up my whole legs before he was satisfied.

The same combination showed up in two other regular spots. If I was sitting on the toilet, he expected butt pats while he confirmed my scent around my feet and lower legs — sometimes rolling onto my feet afterward and asking for belly rubs. And on the sofa, the same ritual would turn into him wanting to smell my feet, which meant crossing my legs to bring one foot up close enough for him.

In his last couple of weeks, this became one of the ways I checked in on him throughout the day. I’d lightly tap his butt — if he lifted or moved even a little, I’d keep going. If he didn’t respond at all, I took that as a sign of how much discomfort he was in, and I’d switch to just gentle regular pets instead.

Health

Richard came with a couple of ongoing health issues I managed with the vet over the years. He had a persistent yeast infection in one ear — he both loved and hated the cleanings, hating the liquid and the swab, loving the relief once it was over.

One of his canine teeth was compromised, though it never fully infected. It gave him occasionally terrible breath but never once stopped him from crunching his favorite treats.

The Cat Bed

Any time I was pulling clothes out of my closet or dresser to donate — even freshly washed, straight out of the laundry — I’d find Richard curled up in the box. No matter how many times you wash something, it still smells like you, and he wanted to be in it.

Around the same time, I’d left a couple of empty shipping boxes out after ordering something online — Zoe-sized boxes. I’d put a blanket in one and some packing paper in the other, and Zoe claimed one of them as her sleeping spot. It made me wonder if she’d actually like a proper cat bed, so I picked up a five-dollar one at Five Below, figuring it was cheap enough to try and lose nothing if it didn’t work out.

The next thing I knew, Richard was the one in it. A cat who almost never used a clothes box, who preferred sleeping tucked under covers, in a closet, or in the bathroom, had suddenly claimed this small bed I’d bought for Zoe. And then, more often than not, I’d find them both in it together — one of the most adorable things about their bond was how they slept curled up in that little bed side by side.

Since Richard died this week, Zoe hasn’t touched that bed. She hasn’t even gone up on the sofa it sits on — the same sofa where the two of them used to sleep before the bed even existed. It turns out that bed was really his all along, and Zoe was just a guest who dropped in now and then. She’s still got toys scattered through it that Richard never once played with. It’s one more way he surprised me, and one more thing I didn’t expect to learn about him only after he was gone.

Play, Water, and Food

Richard was about three when I adopted him — young enough to still be kittenish, the way Zoe very much was — but he rarely showed it, except every so often when I’d catch him going to town on one of Zoe’s toys. The second a camera came out, though, he’d stop. I have almost no footage of him playing.

The one thing he’d never back down from, even with Zoe around, was rugs. Lift the edge of a rug with a foot or hand, bounce it lightly, and he’d go wild — chasing it, grabbing it, pulling up the edge. We had one long runner rug that, curled up like a tunnel, he’d jet straight into every time.

He loved water in a way that never quite made sense for a cat. Mornings, he’d sometimes climb straight into the shower before I turned it on, and stay there while the water warmed up, as long as the spray didn’t hit him directly. After my shower, he’d get in and lick up the leftover droplets. He’d sit in the kitchen just to listen to the sound of running water while I did dishes — though the moment an actual drop touched him, he was gone. And on Fridays, when I filled the pitcher to water my cat-safe houseplants, he’d come running to watch the water pool on the glass catch-plate underneath and drink it straight from there.

Food was a harder subject by the end, because it was what first told me something was seriously wrong — a day of sudden, repeated vomiting, until he associated eating with getting sick and stopped eating altogether.

But when he was well, he loved seafood without question — salmon, tuna, sushi the moment I opened the container, shrimp most of all (I learned fast to always save him one). He wasn’t especially food-motivated otherwise; that was more Zoe’s department. He did love soft cheeses — American, Havarti, Fontina — in tiny pinched-off bits, and hot dogs, the meat itself rather than the bun Shadow used to beg for.

His Last Three Weeks

There was no warning. On a Tuesday, Richard ate his regular breakfast like any other morning. Then, out of nowhere, he threw up a massive puddle of partially digested food — something I don’t think had ever happened with him before. He went back and ate again. He threw it up again. That was the first signal, and it echoed the exact same first signal my very first cat, Miles, had given me when he first got sick years earlier.

The timing couldn’t have been worse. It was right before the Fourth of July weekend, when vets and animal hospitals are closed. We couldn’t get seen until the Monday after — almost a week from when the vomiting and the not-eating first started.

We limped through that week however we could. We tried churros for the first time, and for about two days it was the one thing that got food into him without it coming back up — until it just stopped working, and he wouldn’t touch another one. Otherwise, he’d lick the juice off his favorite canned foods but leave the food itself untouched. The one time he actually ate some, he threw it up almost immediately. He’d clearly connected eating with getting sick.

When we finally got in and ran diagnostics, we found a massive tumor in his liver. I’d been through something similar before, with Miles — digestive organ compromise, the surgeries, the supplements, the force-feeding pills, the stress on their small bodies — and Miles never got a lovely long life or a real recovery out of that fight. I wasn’t willing to put Richard through that same road for the same likely outcome. I chose supportive, palliative care instead, and my vet was fully on board with that decision.

We came home with supplements and appetite stimulants, and for a couple of days it seemed a little easier. But he never really got back to eating — maybe a tablespoon of his regular dry food once, otherwise just licking the juice from a can. I tried a whole rotation of new brands and flavors, since even the wet foods he’d loved for years weren’t working anymore. He did get back to peeing normally, but in three full weeks, that poor cat only pooped once.

The liver damage was already so advanced that one of his test readings came back higher than the test was even able to measure. We were past any chance of a material recovery.

Still, he rallied a little in the second and third week — coming out more, asking for pets, snuggling again for a bit. Zoe noticed the rally too, but she read it as things going back to normal. She’d kept her distance the whole time he was actively sick, only snuggling with him at night in bed, sensing that he didn’t want to be touched or bothered. But during the rally, she started trying to go back to him, rubbing against him playfully. He yelled at her. He hissed at her once. That’s when I knew he was done.

I made the decision to keep him with me through that final weekend and take him in on the Monday afternoon, on purpose — I didn’t want work as a distraction, I wanted to be fully present. Maybe that was selfish of me. I’m okay with that. I watched him closely those last couple of days. He’d still come up onto the sofa, but he wouldn’t curl up anymore — it wasn’t a comfortable position for him. He wasn’t asking for pets either, because being touched didn’t feel good anymore. He’d just sit and look at me. And I knew that look was him telling me he was ready. It turned out I had the timing exactly right.

His Last Day

That last morning, we got up when it got light out, and he sat in the front window watching the world start its day — people on their morning walks, cars pulling out for work, the sun coming up, the birds and the bugs. He took his usual nap tucked under the covers. We had some sweet, quiet moments together. At one point, he held my hand.

Richard and Zoe are the first cats I’ve had with no overlap with the ones who came before them — no crossover time with Miles, my first cat, or Angel, my second, or Shadow, my third. So that last day, while he slept, I talked to him more than once. I told him to go find Miles, because Miles had gone through this same thing at almost exactly the same age, and Miles would know what he was feeling. I told him to go find Angel, because Angel was so much like Zoe and would want to take care of him, snuggle him, make him feel loved. And I told him to go find Shadow, because Shadow loved being outside in a way Richard never got the chance to safely enjoy, and Shadow would teach him to climb trees.

As the sedative started to take him under, I told him once more: go find Miles. And after the doctor confirmed there was nothing left, in the quiet of that room, I said it to him one final time. I know it was just a reflex, nothing more, but it felt like Richard gasped. I needed him to have that instruction, that connection, so that when he crossed over, there’d be somebody already there waiting for him.

When I got home that night, I put the shirt I’d been wearing that day on the bed, not knowing what Zoe would need. I left his pillowcase and bedding out too, keeping his smell close by for Zoe. She hasn’t seemed troubled by any of it. I think, somehow, she already knew.

Coming Home

Every pet I’ve had before Richard went to communal cremation when they died — I got back a small nose print and paw print stamp, shared with other animals, and that was enough. This time was different.

While we were in the vet’s special room for passings, Richard walked over to a shelf where there were end of life brochures and different urns and boxes. I held them up, one at a time, and Richard looked right at them — and at me — and very clearly signaled the one he wanted by reaching out with a paw and pulling it to him. So this time, I chose individual cremation, with a plaster paw print made just for him.

I picked him up this past Friday, July 24th. He’s home now, urn and paw print both, with me and Zoe. I’ll figure out how I want to display him, and I’ll add a photo here once I do — but for now, he’s just home.

Posted in Cultural Commentary, Current Events

The Shape of This Thing: Workshopping the Trump Second Term Nickname

The Nickname Always Comes

Every presidency gets a nickname. It’s how history takes notes. And we are absolutely, already, in the middle of writing this one — even if we won’t admit that’s what we’re doing.

The New Deal. The Great Society. The War on Terror. Even the ones we’d rather forget get compressed into something portable — a phrase that does the work of a thousand policy papers in a single breath. The nickname isn’t assigned. It emerges. It’s the thing that survives when the news cycle finally exhausts itself and what’s left is just the shape of what happened. ([1], [2])


This One Is Different

Donald Trump’s second term — non-consecutive, which is its own historical oddity, the first since Grover Cleveland — presents a particular challenge to that process. Because you can’t entirely separate the second term from the first, and yet they aren’t the same thing either. The first term felt like an experiment. The second feels like a conclusion. And the nickname, whenever it solidifies, will have to account for both the man who showed us what he was and the country that, knowing exactly what he was, said yes again.

This one has a different problem. The shape keeps changing. Or rather — there are too many shapes, and they’re all accurate, and none of them are quite enough.


The Metaphors I Tried First

I started with the Homecoming King President. It’s the kind of framing that lands differently if you’re a Gen X woman — if you were there, watching from the bleachers, already fluent in the language of unearned social power. The performative popularity contest, the sash, the way the title confers status without requiring competence. For those of us who watched the football captain and the head cheerleader crowned on a gymnasium floor while the rest of us observed, the metaphor felt viscerally right. Social dominance dressed up as celebration. Power that was never really earned, just… confirmed.

But it didn’t hold. Partly because homecoming court has actually changed — younger generations have genuinely disrupted who gets crowned, and increasingly it’s queer kids, kids with disabilities, kids who would have been invisible in our era. The institution got reclaimed, at least partially. Using it as a stand-in for retrograde power feels like it insults the reclamation. And partly because the metaphor lives in the past. It explains where this came from. It doesn’t capture what it’s doing.

The Fraternity President came closer. White fraternities — and the whiteness matters here, because it’s doing specific work that Black fraternities, with their entirely different histories and purposes, are not — spent the 1990s hemorrhaging legitimacy through hazing scandals that exposed what the culture actually required to sustain itself. Conformity enforced through humiliation. Hierarchy maintained through ritual degradation. Brotherhood that was always conditional on your willingness to absorb harm and call it tradition. Sound familiar.

And they’ve been declining ever since. Chapters closing. Membership shrinking. Younger generations simply refusing to accept that this is who runs campus culture anymore. The Fraternity President metaphor works because it’s not just a description — it’s a trajectory. It captures the last gasp quality of this moment. The guy holding the paddle insisting this is still how things work, while the quad empties out around him.

But even that isn’t quite big enough. Because the quad isn’t just American anymore.


The Abdication

The nickname that keeps pulling at me is something in the register of The Abdication. Not because it’s the one that will stick — I’m not sure it’s culturally sticky enough — but because it names what the rest of the world is actually experiencing. The word has history. When Edward VIII abdicated the British throne in 1936, it was a single act by a single man that rewrote the trajectory of the monarchy, the country, and arguably the course of World War II — because the man who stepped into the void, George VI, was a different kind of leader entirely, and the alliances that held or fractured in those years turned on questions of character and commitment at the top. One abdication. Seismic consequences. The ripples are still visible if you know where to look.

The parallel isn’t perfect — it never is. But there’s something in the structure of it that fits. A voluntary relinquishment of responsibility dressed up as something else. In Edward’s case, love. In this case, grievance, nationalism, and the transactional worldview of someone who has never encountered a relationship he didn’t believe could be reduced to a deal. NATO allies quietly recalibrating. Long-standing trade relationships treated like inconveniences. Decades of diplomatic architecture dismantled with the energy of someone clearing out a storage unit. Other countries aren’t just watching America change. They’re building around American unreliability the way you’d build around a neighbor who stopped maintaining their property. You don’t wait for them to fix it. You put up your own fence.


The Other Side of the Workshop

There’s a version of this that his supporters would call long overdue. America finally stopped subsidizing the world’s problems. Stopped playing global hall monitor. Started putting its own interests first. The nickname from that vantage point might be something like The Correction. The Restoration. The Return. Something that frames this presidency not as destruction but as recalibration — a rebalancing of a system that had drifted so far from its original constituency that a wrecking ball wasn’t just inevitable, it was necessary. Those nicknames are being workshopped too, in different corners of the internet, with equal conviction and, it should be said, with genuine grievance underneath them. The people who feel that way aren’t wrong that something had stopped working for them. They’re just wrong about what broke it, and who broke it, and who’s going to pay for fixing it.


The Naming Problem

Which brings me to the naming problem that keeps me up at night more than any of the others.

MAGA will almost certainly make it into the final characterization. The movement is too dominant, too self-branded, too deliberately constructed for posterity to be left out of the historical shorthand entirely. But I hope — and I mean this as something more than preference — that it doesn’t end up inside the nickname itself. Because MAGA is a self-constructed brand, built for exactly this purpose: to colonize the historical record on its own terms, to be the thing that gets written in the margin forty years from now. If the nickname the culture lands on includes MAGA, the movement wins a kind of posterity it hasn’t earned. It gets to name itself. And that is not a neutral act.

And MAGA didn’t arrive alone. It arrived with a blueprint. Project 2025 — the 900-page governing document produced by the Heritage Foundation before a single vote was cast in 2024 — is the thing that separates this presidency from every chaotic, norm-busting moment that preceded it. Trump spent much of the campaign distancing himself from it, which is its own telling detail. But the fingerprints are everywhere: in the dismantling of federal agencies, in the restructuring of the civil service, in the systematic removal of institutional friction that used to slow the exercise of unchecked executive power. MAGA is the feeling. Project 2025 is the architecture. The nickname that history assigns to this era will have to reckon with the fact that what happened wasn’t improvised. It was written down. In advance. With footnotes.


What It Says About Us

The nickname that sticks will be the one that holds both registers at once — the absurdity and the damage, the spectacle and the harm. The one that makes people in 2040 immediately picture something. Not a policy. Not a party. A feeling. The specific feeling of watching something load-bearing get removed from a structure everyone was living inside, and realizing — too late or just in time, depending on where you stood — that nobody was going to put it back.

We – the public – are workshopping that nickname right now in real time. This piece is proof. And what that says about us — that we’re already reaching for the historical shorthand while the history is still happening — might be the most honest thing any of us have written about this moment.


Presidential Nicknames To Date

You can check out previous presidential era nicknames at these sources:

Wikipedia — List of Nicknames of Presidents of the United States — comprehensive, covers every president with sourced context for how each nickname originated

Fiveable — Presidential Nicknames to Know — more analytical; connects nicknames to their historical context and what each reveals about the era, not just the man

Posted in Children

Better Graduation Books Than _Oh, the Places You’ll Go_

The Problem with the Seuss Default

Oh, the Places You’ll Go has become the default graduation gift for one simple reason: it feels meaningful without requiring much thought. It’s colorful, familiar, and its message — you’re special, life will be an adventure, you’ll figure it out — is warm and easy to receive. For a gift-giver, it checks every box.

But that’s also exactly the problem. The book is vague by design. It acknowledges that life will be hard (“the Waiting Place,” the slumps) but offers no tools, no framework, no honest reckoning with what hard actually looks like. Its central promise — that the graduate is destined for great places simply by virtue of being themselves — is comforting in the moment and quietly unhelpful afterward. It mistakes encouragement for wisdom.

There’s also a more uncomfortable possibility worth naming: Oh, the Places You’ll Go may resonate less with graduates than with the adults giving it. Its vision of the child as a singular, destined protagonist — launched into the world but still defined by the wonder and innocence of childhood — is deeply comforting to a parent who isn’t quite ready to let go. The book keeps the graduate small in the most loving way possible. It whispers that the world is theirs, while quietly preserving the parent’s role as the one who believed in them first, who shaped who they are, whose hopes and dreams are woven into their future. For a parent grieving the end of a particular kind of closeness — the daily influence, the shared household, the child who still looked to them for answers — Seuss offers a gentle farewell that doesn’t fully acknowledge that the farewell is happening. That’s understandable. But it’s the parent’s emotional need, not the graduate’s. And the graduate deserves a gift chosen for them.

Graduates, whether leaving high school or college, are standing at a threshold that deserves more than a well-meaning shrug. They need books that take their intelligence seriously, that grapple with real questions — about meaning, identity, failure, work, and what a good life actually requires. The books below do that.


For High School Graduates

These books are accessible, relatively short, and speak directly to the experience of being 17 or 18 — full of possibility but uncertain about identity, direction, and what comes next.

1. The Alchemist by Paulo Coelho A slim, allegorical fable about a shepherd boy who sets out to find treasure and discovers that the journey itself is the point. It romanticizes purpose without being naive about the cost of pursuing it. Readable in a weekend, resonant for years.

2. Range by David Epstein A research-driven argument that generalists — people who explore widely before specializing — tend to outperform early specialists in the long run. An enormous relief for any 18-year-old who doesn’t know what they want to do with their life yet. Spoiler: that’s a feature, not a bug.

3. Bird by Bird by Anne Lamott Ostensibly a book about writing, but really a book about showing up to hard things in small, manageable pieces. Her concept of “shitty first drafts” applies to college essays, careers, relationships — essentially everything. Funny, honest, and deeply practical.

4. The Last Lecture by Randy Pausch A Carnegie Mellon professor, given a terminal cancer diagnosis, delivers one final lecture about achieving childhood dreams and enabling others to do the same. Warm, specific, and full of concrete life lessons. Reads in an afternoon and lands hard.

5. Bossypants by Tina Fey (especially for young women) Part memoir, part comedy masterclass, entirely honest about ambition, imposter syndrome, and navigating institutions that weren’t built for you. Makes the case — through laughter — that confidence is built, not born.


For College Graduates

These books assume a bit more life experience and engage with harder questions: career, meaning, mortality, and what it actually takes to build something worth building.

1. So Good They Can’t Ignore You by Cal Newport A direct challenge to “follow your passion” — arguably the most damaging advice given to young people. Newport argues, with evidence, that passion follows mastery, not the other way around. Essential reading for anyone anxious about finding their “calling.”

2. The Defining Decade by Meg Jay A clinical psychologist makes a calm, compelling case that your 20s are not a throwaway decade — that the choices made between 22 and 32 have an outsized impact on the rest of life. Not alarmist. Genuinely clarifying.

3. Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl A psychiatrist who survived Auschwitz writes about how meaning — not happiness — is what allows humans to endure almost anything. Brief, devastating, and one of the most important books of the 20th century. Every graduate should read it before they’re 25.

4. When Breath Becomes Air by Paul Kalanithi A neurosurgeon facing terminal lung cancer writes about what makes a life worth living. It asks the questions that a diploma doesn’t answer: What do I value? What do I owe others? What will I leave? Beautifully written and impossible to put down.

5. Shoe Dog by Phil Knight Nike’s origin story, told as a raw, unglamorous memoir. Knight was broke, uncertain, and frequently on the verge of collapse for over a decade. More than any business book, it captures what building something actually feels like — and why it’s worth it anyway.


Any of these will outlast the Seuss book on a shelf — and more importantly, in the mind of the person who reads it.

Posted in Being Healthy, coeliac friendly, Cooking, corn free, dairy free, diabetes, diabetic friendly, gluten free, low carb, nut free

Middle Eastern Chicken and Potato Dupe

While doom scrolling one night, I came across this recipe video for Middle Eastern Chicken and Potato one pot bake. Mmmm, mm – now that’s my kind of dinner inspiration.

plated vision

The Things I Like and Will Use

One pot – while the video shows using a pot that is commonly used when starting a meal on the stove and then finishing in the oven, there’s no reason you can’t or shouldn’t use a sheet pan or standard baking dish.

Chicken thighs – bone in with the skin – this is my favorite piece of chicken to cook with. The little extra fat keeps it juicy while cooking and adds that little bit of extra flavor you just can’t get from a chicken breast.

Covered and uncovered cooking. When cooking meat with the bone in, it can be hard to confidently cook it through, so cooking covered – foil or lid – is an excellent way to achieve this. And then the shorter uncovered time is for crisping up the skin so if you are eating that (and you don’t have to), it’s a delightfully crispy crunch.

The Things I’ll Take Inspiration From and Why

Now, I love the idea and all of the individual and collective flavors of this dish, but I find myself on a tighter food budget these days. So here’s how I’m making this work with what’s in my pantry.

Lemon – rather than rely on fresh lemons and their rising cost from tariffs, I keep a bottle of lemon juice in the fridge. It’s controversial with professional chefs, but it’s far more versatile and I don’t have to worry about it going bad or drying out.

And as it happens, I also just bought a ton of Greek lemon infused olive oil, so I’ll also be prepping the baking dish with this lemon oil to contribute to the dish as well.

Tomato paste – I don’t cook anything that uses tomato paste – not even marinara. So I never have this ingredient in the house. What do I have? Ketchup. So tonight, the “sauce” base is ketchup.

Aleppo pepper – that’s a pretty specific spice that’s not part of my pantry, but in the spirit of peppers with and without heat, I have lots of others. For this, I added a squeeze of Sriracha for just a hint of heat and smoked paprika for the smokiness from dried pepper.

Cumin – so I definitely have cumin, but I was feeling more curry, so I switched. That simple – followed what my palate was more interest in.

Carbs – so this dish as shown in the video is pretty high carb and not at all diabetic friendly, so I made some simple additions and one subtraction to balance this out:

  • removed rice – because rice is my least favorite carb
  • added quartered onions
  • added chunks of zucchini

Both the onion and zucchini are highly traditional additions to meals from countries and cultures east of the Mediterranean to the Indian Ocean and to the Pacific.

Side Note on the Term “Middle Eastern”

I’m nearing my 50th birthday as I make this dinner, and I recall a video excerpt I found earlier this week that challenged the terms “middle East” and “far East” as colonial, and therefore, oppressive terms. Yes, I agree, and I wanted to bring your attention to this. You see, the words “middle” and “east” only have meaning when we know the origin point – middle compared to what? east compared to what fixed point. In this case – it’s London – the center of the British colonial empire.

In that paradigm, then, “East” refers to everything east of the Mediterranean to the Pacific ocean, the middle of which is the Arabic and Indian countries and cultures and the “far” of which is the aggregate of the Asian cultures.

I offer these as generalized geographic assignments for the colonial “Middle East”:

  • Western Asia
  • Southwest Asia
  • West Asia and North Africa (WANA)

I offer these as generalized geographic assignments for the colonial “Far East”:

  • East Asia
  • Pacific Asia
  • Northeast Asia – Korea, Japan, northern China
  • Southeast Asia – Vietnam, Thailand, Indonesia

I offer these as generalized geographic assignments for the colonial “Indian subcontinent”:

  • South Asia
  • The subcontinent

I offer these as generalized geographic assignments for Arabic-speaking regions

  • Arab world or Arab states
  • North Africa and Arabian Peninsula

These alternatives focus on the geography relative to the region itself rather that in comparison with a conquering or colonial empire center.

One of the obvious challenges to Westerners is that our sense of world geography is likely to confound most in correcting our terminology. Beyond that, these terms have been assigned cultural meaning as well that may not align with the geographic/continental mapping, where a term like “Middle Eastern” is generalize to Arabic speaking countries regardless of their geographic location, and likewise “Far East” to a reductive understanding of Asian to refer to those of Chinese, Japanese, Thai, Vietnamese, Korea, and Indonesian descent.

This discussion deserves far more exploration, so thank you for not skimming just to get to more details about the recipe.

The Ingredients

In the recommended order of preparing (to make it easy to assemble):

  • 8 tiny golden creamer potatoes, quartered (or 4 medium or 2 large)
  • 3-4 small yellow or white onions, peeled and quartered
  • 2 medium zucchinis, cut into 1-inch thick “slices” or round chunks
  • 1/2 cup ketchup (or the tomato and pepper paste combo from the original recipe)
  • 1/2 lemon juice (bottle or fresh squeezed)
  • 1T Sriracha (or 1T Aleppo pepper from the original recipe)
  • 1T curry (or cumin from the original recipe)
  • 1T garlic powder (or 4-5 fresh cloves minced)
  • 1T oregano
  • 2t salt
  • 1t pepper
  • 4-6 chicken thighs, bone in with skin (or breasts or leg quarters)

The Assembly Process

Here’s how to layer it all into your baking dish.

Step 1: wash and chop your potatoes, onion, and zucchini. Drop them all into a greased baking dish, ideally into a single layer. They’ll be squished together, which is good.

potatoes, onions, and zucchini - large cut and mixed in the bottom of the baking dish

Step 2: in a measuring cup or other vessel with a pour spout, add your wet and spice ingredients and then mix well with a whisk or fork.

sauce ingredients collected and started in the measuring cup with pour spout

Step 3: pour about half of the sauce over the veggies. Use a spoon or tongs to toss the veggies in the sauce to coat all sides.

Step 4: place your chicken on top.

Step 5: pour most of the remaining sauce and use your hand(s) to quickly coat the entire chicken thigh – not just the top. Pour any remaining sauce on top of the chicken.

use all of the sauce - half on the veggies first and the remaining amount on the chicken placed on top of the veggies in the backing dish

The Cooking Process

Step 1: preheat the oven to 400 degrees Farenheit. NOTE: I do not wait for the oven to fully preheat to put in the dish; my oven rarely takes more than 7-8 minutes total to preheat, so the difference is negligible for such a long-baking dish.

Step 2: cover the baking dish with foil, wrapping the edges snuggly around the end handles.

foil sealed baking dish placed on the lowest oven rack (closest to the baking heating element)

Step 3: bake for 45 minutes with the foil on and on the lowest rack, closest to the baking element (usually at the bottom of the oven).

Step 4: slide out the oven rack and remove the foil lid.

uncovered for the final 15-20 minutes

Step 5: push the oven rack back in and set the timer for another 15 minutes. This is an essential step for cooking the skin to be pleasant to eat and ensure the meat is fully cooked.

Step 6: take out of the oven and let rest for 10-15 minutes to cool enough to eat without burning fingers and tongues.

when it’s all done – let cool and serve

Enjoy!

Posted in Cultural Commentary, Mental Health

Twice Cursed with Glass Child Syndrome

At T-minus nine months to turning fifty, I finally have a name for my trauma: Glass Child Syndrome.

And I’m twice cursed.

Let me set the stage. I am the oldest daughter of an oldest daughter and a middle son. That is not a throwaway detail. That is the whole architecture of what happened to me, twice.

What Glass Child Syndrome Actually Is

The term was coined to describe the siblings of children with chronic illness, disability, or significant behavioral and medical needs — kids who become see-through in their own families because all available light is bent toward the sibling in crisis. The name comes from the idea that these children are treated as though they don’t break. No one checks on the glass. Glass just sits there, transparent and load-bearing, until it doesn’t.

The research on this is not exotic. Family systems theory has documented for decades what happens when a household reorganizes itself entirely around one child’s needs: the other children absorb the household’s stress without receiving any of its resources. They become hyper-independent early. They stop registering their own needs as legitimate, because there is no bandwidth left to meet them. They often become high-achieving, hyper-competent adults who cannot ask for help, because the lesson was never “someone will help you.” The lesson was “there is no one available, so figure it out.”

Glass children are not neglected in the classic sense. Their parents are present, often exhausted, often loving. That’s part of what makes it so disorienting. The neglect is structural, not personal. It doesn’t look like abandonment. It looks like a mother who is simply, completely, somewhere else.

The First Curse: The Eldest Daughter Script

Before any of this happened to me, I was already cast. Oldest daughter of an oldest daughter. My mother inherited a role before she ever had children — the eldest-daughter job description: manage the household’s emotional weather, absorb what nobody else will carry, be capable so no one has to ask twice. She didn’t invent that script. She was handed it, the way eldest daughters are handed it, and she handed it to me the same way, without either of us voting on it.

So when the second curse arrived, it landed on ground that had already been prepared. I wasn’t just a glass child. I was a glass child who had already been trained to believe that being useful was the price of being loved, and that my own needs were, at best, an inconvenient rounding error.

1986

I was in sixth grade when my brother, in third grade, was diagnosed with ADHD. This was 1986 — early days for that diagnosis, which made my mother’s response even more totalizing. She put him into individual counseling. She put herself and my father into family counseling. She rebuilt the pantry around elimination diets, chasing the theory that the right foods could out-behave the wrong ones.

I got none of it. No counseling, no dietary consideration, no discussion. I also got no praise and no punishment — which sounds like freedom and is actually its opposite. A child who is punished is still being watched. I wasn’t being watched at all.

I became anorexic. It took three years for anyone to notice.

I want to be precise about what that timeline means. Three years is not a lapse in attention. Three years is a fully organized household in which one child’s body was quietly disappearing and no one was positioned to see it, because every eye in the house was pointed at a different child’s diagnosis.

2006

Twenty years later, my brother suffered a brain aneurysm. My mother did what she had always done, at full volume: she turned over her money, her time, her identity. She constructed a private mythology of blame, convinced some invisible failure during her pregnancy had caused this. Guilt, in her hands, became another form of devotion to him.

I was living in Brooklyn at the time, in the final pre-tenure stretch of an academic career I had spent a decade building. She didn’t ask once. She spent six months laying the case at my feet, a phone call at a time. How much everything cost. How hard it was to run a business and manage my brother’s care in the same day. How my father taught all day and commuted for hours on top of it, which meant he wasn’t available for any of it. Every call was a new signal, in slightly different language, that she could not do this alone and could not do it without more money. She never said “come home.” She built an eighteen-month case for why I would have to conclude that myself.

I gave up the tenure track and moved home to manage their care and their finances, because she had already spent everything she had on him and there was nothing left to spend on the crisis itself. That wasn’t a season. It was thirteen years. From 2006 to 2019, I lived in their house, paid their bills, and did whatever else the moment required, because the moment never stopped requiring it.

I did not get talked into this in a direct or obvious way but with systemic hints and little guilts over eighteen months. I did it the way glass children do everything — automatically, because the alternative required a version of myself that had never been allowed to develop: one that says no.

Now

I’ve lived out of their house again for seven years. I am invisible in the exact same way I was in 1986, just with better production values. I surface in their world when there’s something to buy, something to fix, something only money or competence can solve. That is still, apparently, the whole of what I’m for.

The Gen X Layer

There’s a generational version of this too, and it’s not incidental. I am Gen X — the latchkey cohort, the ones who let ourselves in after school and were praised for our independence as though it had been a choice rather than an absence. Gen X was collectively trained to read “no one is coming” as a virtue. We call it resilience. It was supervision that never arrived.

My brother is two and a half years younger than me and is, in every way that matters, barely Gen X. He is a millennial in temperament, in expectation, in his relationship to being taken care of. Two and a half years, and an entire generational contract shifted underneath us — inside the same house, under the same roof, from the same parents. He got the version of parenting that shows up. I got the version that watches from a distance and calls it trust.

That’s the second curse, really. Not just being the glass child. Being the glass child who was also handed the eldest-daughter job description and the Gen X survival manual, all three telling me the same thing in three different vocabularies: don’t need anything, and you’ll be fine.

I wasn’t fine. I was just quiet about it, for a very long time.

Not Quiet Anymore

I’m not quiet anymore. And I’m not the same person who spent thirteen years in that house without ever being directly asked to stay. That version of me didn’t know how to say no. She thought silence was the price of being loved, and being needed was as close to it as she was going to get. I rescued her in 2019, when I finally left that house behind and moved away to build my own life and my own career again — to go chase what made me happy instead of what kept everyone else afloat.

What that means going forward is simple, and I want to say it plainly instead of letting it sit as subtext: I am not going to be the daughter who steps in to manage aging parents or a disabled adult brother a third time. Not because I’ve stopped caring what happens to them. I have just been excluded from being family for so long, and so consistently, that I no longer qualify for the role I’d be stepping into. You cannot be structurally invisible for thirty-five years and then get handed the job that only exists for people who were seen. That job was never going to be mine. I’m done applying for it.

Further Reading on Glass Child Syndrome

Cleveland Clinic — health.clevelandclinic.org/glass-child A clinically reviewed overview of the term, its symptoms, and its long-term emotional impact, written for a general audience by one of the country’s leading hospital systems.

“Recognizing Glass Children” — Alicia Maples, TEDxSanAntonio (2010) — YouTube The original talk that coined the term. Maples, who lost one brother to autism and another to a terminal illness, traces how “glass child” entered the public vocabulary in the first place.

Psychology Today — “I Was a Glass Child. Here’s What the Term Means to Me.” A journalist’s personal essay tracing the term back to Alicia Maples’ 2010 TEDx talk, with a thoughtful look at what the label does and doesn’t capture.

Sibling Support Project — siblingsupport.org Founded in 1990, the oldest and largest national organization dedicated specifically to siblings of people with disabilities and chronic illness — peer support groups, research compilations, and community for sibs of every age.

Newsweek — “I Was a ‘Glass Child’ — It Made Me an Anxious Adult” Reported coverage that grounds the personal accounts in peer-reviewed research and commentary from psychologists and family therapists.

Posted in Being Healthy, coeliac friendly, Cooking, dairy free, diabetes, diabetic friendly, gluten free, low carb, vegan

Lasagna – Gluten Free, Dairy Free, Nightshade Free, Accidentally Vegan

I’ve been craving lasagna, but anything Italian is really hard when your food allergies/intolerances hit all three major Italian points: pasta, cheese, and tomatoes. I mean, c’mon, it’s their flag, for crying out loud.

Gluten-free Lasagna Noodles

Gluten free pasta is easy as long as you have some kind of access to the Italian made stuff – and thank Amazon, I do! These gluten free, egg free, no cook lasagna noodles are perfect. In fact, one box makes two 9×9 lasagnas for the single person (or maybe 2-person family). Highly recommend, but you do you.

Buy on Amazon at https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00HRJNNSS/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?smid=A3MXLTRINUPWUY&psc=1

Tomato-free Sauce

This piece of the puzzle has taken me the longest to figure out because all of the “red” vegetables are nightshades, and that’s specifically what I need to avoid – no tomatoes, no peppers. And it finally hit me – ratatouille sauce: roast down what’s currently in season and then blend into a sauce.

What I made today is

  • 1 zucchini
  • 2 carrots
  • 1 whole pod of garlic
  • 1 package of frozen riced cauliflower
  • 2 cups homemade vegetable stock
  • 2T Badia Italian Seasoning
  • 1t salt
  • 1t pepper (I like a little kick)
  • 2T cooking oil of your choice (I like grapeseed oil)

Roast the zucchini, carrots, and garlic at 350 for 45 minutes. While those are roasting, dump the frozen riced cauliflower in a sauce pan with 1 cup of the veggie stock and heat on low, mainly to thaw the cauliflower; you don’t need to “cook” anything.

When the roasting veggies are done, add them to the sauce pan and blend with an immersion blender. Add more veggie stock as needed to get to your desired thick or thinness.

Set aside until ready to assemble.

Dairy-free Ricotta Filling

In the absence of any options for dairy-free ricotta in any market (brick-and-mortar or online), I turn to tofu, which is my go-to for replacing “creamy” ingredients. Normally for this I use silken tofu as it’s already in a soft, silky, creamy state. But I only had extra firm tofu today to make this recipe, so here’s how I turned it into even better faux ricotta than when I use silken: crumble it up well with your fingers, add about 1 cup of liquid (I used my homemade veggie stock), and blend with an immersion blender (secret weapon of this recipe, IMO). Then I add my “regular” mixins:

  • 1 cup shredded zucchini
  • 1 package of sliced mushrooms – sauteed until golden brown
  • 1/2 medium white onion, finely diced (about 2/3 cup) – sauteed with the mushroom until translucent
  • 3 cloves garlic, finely minced
  • 1T Badia Italian Seasoning blend – you do you
  • 1/2t salt
  • 1/4t pepper

Cook the mushrooms by themselves in the same pan you roasted the ratatouille veggies in – no extra oil is needed. Once the mushrooms have browned and the water they released evaporated, move them all to the outer edge of the pan and drop in the onions. Sautee maybe 2-3 minutes more until the onions are less white and moving towards clear-ish. Scoop it all into a bowl to cool for just a minute before mixing into the tofu ricotta.

Mix well in a bowl and set aside until ready to layer.

One of my favorite things about tofu as opposed to soy is that tofu is high protein with almost no carbs; soy is just the opposite – mostly carb with a modest amount of protein much lower than the carb load.

Let’s Assemble

There’s no wrong way to layer lasagna, but I have a few things I like to do to ensure the no-cook noodles are given the best shot at success:

  • Start with sauce on the bottom of the pan before you put in noodle sheets
  • Top each layer with sauce so the noodles are always being set into sauce

When you do this, you ensure that there is always liquid surrounding the noodles during cooking so that they come out lovely and fully cooked like pasta should be.

Otherwise, the tip is to be patient, and to press the thicker layer instead of “spreading” them.

Final Bake

Once you’ve got all your layers done, bake at 350 for 35 minutes. If you are using any cheese on top of yours – regular or dairy free – I recommend adding at the 30-minute mark and baking for about 10 more minutes (longer if you like your cheese browned and crunchy).

Posted in Being Healthy, coeliac friendly, Cooking, dairy free, diabetes, diabetic friendly, gluten free, low carb, nut free, soy free

Chicken, Zucchini, and Corn Burgers

I’ve been craving zucchini fritters and corn fritters and have been on a ground chicken kick, so when I came across this recipe for Chicken, Zucchini, and Corn Burgers from The Cafe Sucre Farine, the ingredients when on the shopping list!

And if you’ve followed me for any length of time, you know I had to make a couple of modifications due to food allergies – though thankfully not huge changes:

  • red peppers (nightshades) are replaced by chopped frozen spinach
  • panko (gluten) is replaced by chickpea flour

Check out how this recipe when for me.

Mise en Place

I’ve been taking an online cooking course in gluten-free and dairy-free cooking, and the first lesson isn’t in cooking itself but in the philosophy of mise en place – preparing all of your raw ingredients so that once you begin with assembly, you won’t have to stop or worry about missing something as you move efficiently through the cooking process. So that’s how I started here since it’s all raw ingredients, mixing and shaping, and then cooking.

  • 1 lb ground chicken
  • 1 cob of corn, kernels sliced off
  • 1 cup shredded and drained zucchini
  • 1/2 cup frozen chopped spinach
  • 4 green onions, sliced
  • 3 cloves garlic, minced
  • 1 egg, beaten
  • 4-6T chickpea flour
  • 2T cilantro
  • 1T cuminn
  • 1T salt
  • 1/2T pepper

Mix with Your Hands

Both sides of my family – the country cooks and the city cooks – have a hands-on approach to cooking. Pretty much any time ground meat is mixed, we use our hands. And this is no exception, especially since I choose to form the burgers and place them on a cookie sheet to bake rather than cook in a skillet.

With replacing the panko with chickpea flour instead of gluten free break crumbs or panko, the mixture remains a bit more wet since there’s not as much carbohydrate to soak up the moisture from the egg, vegetables, and chicken.

I chose to go with the chickpea flour because I wanted more nutritional value than any bread crumb or panko – regular or gluten free – provides while achieving similar results. I also like keeping the moisture available during the cooking process so that the resulting burgers are still juicy.

Meal Prep

And that’s how meal prep is done for this week. These protein- and vitamin-packed burgers will accompany my gluten-free, dairy-free, nightshade-free lasagna for lunch at work.